bal fluid protein concentration (Bio-Rad)
Structured Review

Bal Fluid Protein Concentration, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 22932 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bal fluid protein concentration/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 22932 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "PI3K-AKT Signaling via Nrf2 Protects against Hyperoxia-Induced Acute Lung Injury, but Promotes Inflammation Post-Injury Independent of Nrf2 in Mice"
Article Title: PI3K-AKT Signaling via Nrf2 Protects against Hyperoxia-Induced Acute Lung Injury, but Promotes Inflammation Post-Injury Independent of Nrf2 in Mice
Journal: PLoS ONE
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129676
Figure Legend Snippet: Mice were treated i . p . with LY294002 (LY) or DMSO (vehicle) 1 h prior to exposure and at 24 h intervals during hyperoxia exposure. Mice were exposed to 95% oxygen for 48 h at which time lungs were harvested. The BAL fluid was collected to measure both total cell counts and protein concentration, as markers of lung inflammation and lung injury (permeability), respectively. (A) Total protein in the BAL fluid of room air or hyperoxia-exposed mice treated with vehicle or LY. (B) Total cells in the BAL fluid of room air- or hyperoxia-exposed mice treated with vehicle or LY. (C) Total neutrophils and macrophages in the BAL fluid of vehicle- or LY-treated mice were exposed to room air or hyperoxia. BAL fluids (100 μl) were cytospun onto microslides and stained with Diff Quick stain kit. Differential cell counts were enumerated by counting a total number of 300 cells. The horizontal and vertical lines were plotted as median ± interquartile range for each group (n = 4–5). One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections was performed for multiple group comparisons. * P < 0.05, hyperoxia vs room air; † P < 0.05, vehicle vs LY.
Techniques Used: Protein Concentration, Permeability, Staining, Diff-Quik
Figure Legend Snippet: Nrf2 –/– mice were treated with either vehicle or LY and subsequently exposed to hyperoxia or room air as described in . (A) Total protein in the BAL fluid of room air or hyperoxia exposed Nrf2 –/– mice treated with vehicle or LY. (B) Total cells in the BAL fluid of room air or hyperoxia exposed Nrf2 –/– mice treated with vehicle or LY. (C) Total neutrophils and macrophages in vehicle or LY-treated mice exposed to room air or hyperoxia. The horizontal and vertical lines were plotted as median ± interquartile range for each group (n = 4–5). One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections was performed for multiple group comparisons. * P = 0.05, hyperoxia vs room air; † P = 0.05, vehicle vs LY treated group.
Techniques Used: